Re: weird symbols in sc-expand output (was Re: defining module from macro)
Dan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sisc.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK, I'll file. May I ask that you kindly consider implementing macroexpand in future versions of SISC? I don't feel comfortable with my workaround after your "this is SO unsupported" comment, and I need macroexpand. Best, Dan --- "Scott G. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:29:09AM -0700, Dan wrote: > > Thanks Scott. Here's SISC macroexpand, then. > > > > Also see the bug report below this definition. If > > confirmed, I will submit it on sourceforge. > > > > Why fixx instead of fix? I'd like to report a nice > bug > > in SISC 1.15.2: > > > > #;> (define (fix x) (cons (fix (car x)) (fix (cdr > > x)))) > > Error: Unsupported syntactic type [10]. Should > never > > happen! > > > > Is this just my SISC, or does it happen for anyone > > else too? > > I can confirm that, and I suspect I know whats > wrong. Do submit a bug > report. > > Thanks! > Scott > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642