Re: R6RS opinion

At 04:49 AM 8/8/2007, Ben Simon wrote:

>This may be either too late, or too early to ask -
>
>I'm curious, what's the general opinion of SISC implementors on R6RS?  Is SISC going to strive to be fully R6RS compliant like it is R5RS?
>
>(Sorry if the timing of this question is rude, useless or annoying.) 

Some might consider the timing rude or annoying, but it's certainly
not useless.  The willingness of implementors to follow the proposed
R6RS is very much in question, and this potential splintering of the
community is very relevant to the voting.

SISC is one of the more interesting Scheme implementations for a
variety of reasons including it's focus on following the R5RS standard,
so an authoritative answer would be most useful.

                                        - Harold



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/