R6RS and support for dynamic languages on the JVM?

Colin Coates <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:55:05 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sisc.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear Scott and all,

Please will you give some indication of whether you intend to evolve 
SISC towards being R6RS compliant?

Please will you also indicate whether you intend to evolve SISC towards 
using the new support provided in the Java VM for dynamic languages, in 
particular "invokedynamic"?

Actually, is there a "roadmap" or statement of intent for SISC?

Kind Regards,
Colin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/