Re: SISCweb performance

Hi!

To generate pages you may take a look at my small library: 
http://text-template.sourceforge.net.
An example of its use in production is: http://wap.herocraft.com.

If you are interested I can post my sisc-utils library that is used in 
my sisc based projects and that includes text-template and loader among 
others. But as it often happens there is no or little documentation :)


Regards,
Nikita
> It is nice to know I can always fallback on JSP, but I hope I never
> have to do it. SXML is much cooler :)
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Alessandro Colomba <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Gerardo,
>>
>>  Glad to hear that. You are correct in that, for simple sites, the
>>  conversion of SXML -> (X)HTML takes a substantial portion of the
>>  processing time -- about two thirds in fact. Version 0.6 will likely
>>  feature an SXML compiler, but I can't say when that will happen.
>>
>>  In the meantime, you should find the interface from SISCweb to
>>  JSP/JSTL quite handy if you need to improve performance or decide
>>  you'd like tool support for your pages.
>>  ___
>>  Alessandro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Gerardo Horvilleur <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  > I was doing the tests on my laptop (an iBook G4). I decided to test
>>  >  SISCweb's performance on a server (a Linux box with a 2.4 Ghz P4) and
>>  >  the results were amazing, all the performance problems disappeared! I
>>  >  guess the performance problem on my iBook has something to do with
>>  >  Apple's implementation of the JVM.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >  On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Gerardo Horvilleur <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  >  > I've written a couple of simple apps to test SISCweb and everything
>>  >  >  seems to be working OK (it's fun way to write web apps!).
>>  >  >  But performance doesn't seem to be very good, even very simple
>>  >  >  requests seem to take too long. From my tests it looks like the
>>  >  >  response time depends on the complexity of the page I'm generating, so
>>  >  >  I guess the bottleneck is in transforming sxml into html.
>>  >  >  Does anybody have any more information on this or someway to get
>>  >  >  better response times?
>>  >  >
>>  >  >  --
>>  >  >  Gerardo Horvilleur
>>  >  >  [email protected]
>>  >  >  5813-0830
>>  >  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >  --
>>  >  Gerardo Horvilleur
>>  >  [email protected]
>>  >  5813-0830
>>  >
>>  >  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  >  This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>  >  Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>>  >  http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>  >  _______________________________________________
>>  >  Sisc-users mailing list
>>  >  [email protected]
>>  >  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisc-users
>>  >
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Sisc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisc-users