Re: Smartfrog Components in Gump

Steve Loughran <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.smartfrog.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> apparently Log4J's CVS HEAD is breaking BWC left and right, and Ceki
> says it will stay that way for a while.  Should we move SF components
> to log4j-12 (the 1.2.x branch) or do you expect it to adapt to Log4J's
> CVS HEAD?

I saw that a break had happened; didn't know about its permanence.

We are doing a release of stuff shortly, stuff that depends on the 1.2 
version and not some as-yet-unstable-prerelease; a dependency on the 1.2 
branch makes sense. What changes do I make to the descriptor?


> Note that I haven't researched whether there is an option to support
> both, Log4J 1.2.8 and CVS HEAD in this specific case.

That would be the ideal world.

This actually shows up an interesting problem with Gump. What it enables 
is for developers to change their code in lockstep; so that everything 
is in sync. But without a unified release schedule, being in lockstep 
doesn't really help.

> 
> Happy new year
> 
>         Stefan



And yourself,

-Steve




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.