RE: Prims implementing Compound

 
Yes, but you may need to add in some of the attributes for liveness,etc,
that Compound provides (not many - look in compound.sf)

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: smartfrog-developer-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
[mailto:smartfrog-developer-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
Steve Loughran
Sent: 18 January 2005 13:37
To: smartfrog-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Smartfrog-developer] Prims implementing Compound


I just want to check that what I am about to do will work.

1. I have an
XmlNode extends Prim {
...
}

2. I want XmlElement to extend XmlNode, and be compound. Normally I'd
just extend Compound, but cannot do that here

Can I just get away with

	XmlElement extends XmlNode ...

And in the implementation, have

	class XmlElementImpl extends CompoundImpl Implements XmlElement
{
	...
	}

So the implementation has all the compound logic inherited from the
parent, I just dont actually come out and say it in the descriptor.

Does this work?

-steve



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE
limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Smartfrog-developer mailing list
Smartfrog-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartfrog-developer


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt