Re: Questions about SmartFrog
Steve Loughran <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:30:32 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.smartfrog.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Murray, Paul (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote: > Just a couple of corrections: > >> We also have an anubisdeployer component that exists to deploy anubis itself. > > The AnubisDeployer is a SmartFrog deployer that uses Anubis to determine where to deploy things - it doesn't deploy Anubis. ah, now I understand. Sorry for causing the confusion >> 3. It is currently dependent on the clocks being synchronised. >> If NTP is not working properly across all nodes, you have problems. this is something that >> could be fixed, as it is less fundamental to the design than multicasting. > > This statement is not true (but once was). Anubis has two timing protocols: > - one times clock skew, comms delay and scheduling dely so machines with clocks that drift become untimely relative to one another > - one times comms delay and scheduling delay only, so clocks are allowed to drift. the latter works best on virtualized systems, yes? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4