which workflow component to use
Andreas Unterkircher <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:16:15 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.smartfrog.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | CERN |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I see that there are two new Parallel - like components: Container and FireBreak. We need the following behaviour: 1. Bring up in parallel components on different sfProcessHost. 2. If on one sfProcessHost a component fails it should not bring down all the other components (on other sfProcessHosts) 3. Parallel termination of all components when terminating the parent Parallel component. I think 1. and 3. are implemented in Parallel. For point 2. I'm not sure. Would Container be more appropriate ? Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Unterkircher IT Department Grid Deployment Group CERN CH-1211 Geneva 23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV