Re: [Smartfrog-support] Termination due to slow start-up.

Ismael Juma <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:16:51 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.smartfrog.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:15 +0000, Steve Loughran wrote:
> What is interesting is that even in that interval, say 1000mS, if the 
> child goes live, this fact is remembered -and from then on, failing a 
> ping is a cause for concern.  Unlike the Delay component, which doesnt 
> start its child for a given period, SlowStart starts it, but doesnt 
> expect it to go live.

Interesting. As I outlined in my original message, this is the behaviour
I was expecting, probably due to my web container bias.

> Given that this slow starting is possibly a common behaviour of all web 
> applications, I'm thinking of patching it in to all of them, rather than 
> requiring all deployments to be wrapped in SlowStart declarations. I'd 
> have a base delay for the application server, a value which could be 
> overridden by an explicit delay for the webapp/ear or anything else that 
> you deploy.

+1 from me.

Thanks,
Ismael


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/