Re: spice-apps/spice-sandbox??

Peter Donald wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:26, Mauro Talevi wrote:
> 
>>>spice/site
>>>spice/lib
>>>spice/sandbox
>>>spice/apps
>>>spice/X
>>>
>>>?

how about calling lib -> components?
lib is usually reserved for lib of jars or other resouces used by build.

> 
> I was going to copy as that should be easy enough. But not really fussed 
> either way. 
> 
> BTW if you want to make a start on it then jump on in. I am not going to get a 
> chance to tackle it for a week or more :(
> 

ok - no probs - I'll do it.  As there is not much history to save at the 
moment, I'll copy them.  The transition will be easier for people with 
checkout working dirs.
The other reason why I like to restructure rather than copy is that it 
doesn't leave dangling cvs empty directories.
But we can always put in a request to remove spice-lib module once we 
are migrate to new structure.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com