Re: LoggerStore
Peter Donald <peter-4lf8KW9E9MLMqX/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.spice.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 27 May 2003 06:24 pm, Peter Donald wrote: > Two things remain to do before we do a release; > > * Determine what we are going to do with "type". Do we make a separate > LoggerStoreFactory for each type (XML vs properties). > * Determine if we are keeping Configurator and if we are unit test. I would > prefer to rely directly on InitialLoggerStoreFactory as I think that is > simple enough but if you want to keep it in we can keep it in. > > Any other issues you can think of? documentation! -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge