Re: [jervlet-patch] Make Jervlet-Jetty accept external configurations

On Nov 16, 2003, at 2:59 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote:
> I agree 100%.  Johan's code set it as a matter of convenience for 
> existing jetty configurations who depend on it.  For now, I think one 
> could just set the property before starting loom.  Going forward, is 
> there a way for loom to prepare an environment for a SAR, including 
> its own system properties?

Not really, since system properties aren't scoped, they are set 
container-wide and not per-application. which is unfortunate.

> Of course that will be irrelevant as we begin to support other 
> containers.  Perhaps Johan's suggestion to document the hell out of it 
> is the best after all :)

yup. documentation would work, but i also like Paul's suggestion of 
just getting alternate ways of configuring the things that are 
currently only configurable via system props :)
-pete