Re: BaseAction
Stephan Reichelt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.strutscx.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | FhG IVI |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wouter de Vaal wrote: HI, (strutscx 0.9.3) > This might be an old question, but I'm gonna put it anyway :-) > > Why isn't the BaseAction class in the standard strutscx jar? I'm trying > to port my code to strutscs 0.9.5 and > it seems I was still using the old BaseAction class. And if it is not > needed/wanted anymore, why do the > demo action classes use one? > What would be the best course of action for me? The most important > feature I'm using is the JXProperties object, > for my own configuration which I have put in strutscx-config.xml one reason I could imagine is the facility of extensibility. Our action classes inherit from BaseAction, which we extended by some routines for doing standard jobs (like auth checking, etc. ). MfG, Stephan R. -- [email protected] Fraunhofer IVI Tel: +49 351 4640 616 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click