Re: WebLogic
Deb June <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:35:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.connector |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>I'm rather curious as to why you made this design decision since as far as >I can see the same information is available through the >ConnectionManager. Using the connection manager seems to work fine in >JBoss. Is there something in the spec that requires this style of >implementation? I'm not of liberty to discuss design and/or implementation details in this forum. No, there isn't anything in the 1.0 spec that suggests this design. However, using the ConnectionManager fell short of what we were trying to accomplish. >By wrapping the connection factory as well, can't you provide the proxy >wrapper after it has passed through the ra's connection factory, thus >eliminating this source of cce? Unfortunately no. I would guess that you have to specify the MyConnectionImpl interface as the connection interface in ra.xml in order for wl to generate the correct proxy? No modifications are required in ra.xml to generate the proxy. Pardon the lack of detail but, once again, I'm not of liberty to discuss this here. =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".