Re: AW: JCA 1.5 and ActivationSpec

Sivakumar Thyagarajan <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:21:20 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sun.connector
Organization Sun Microsystems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Stefan

This issue has been fixed in the Sun Java System Application Server Platform Edition
8 2004Q4 Beta [1] that was released recently.

Thanks
--Siva.
[1] http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/download.html#sdk


Stefan Krieger wrote:
> Kevin,
> Siva,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Siva, thanks for submitting this bug. I hope Sun is fixing this bug anyway
> because
> it prevents the development/deployment of most non-trival JCA 1.5 Connectors
> in SunAS.
> I don't like to spread this workaround through our source code.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan Krieger
> Comporsys Hansa GmbH
> Spitzerdorfstr. 3, D-22880 Wedel
> Tel. +49 (0)4103 12117-0
> Fax +49 (0)4103 12117-29
> http://www.comporsys.de
>
>
>
>>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
>>Von: A public list for J2EE Connector architecture interest.
>>[mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Sivakumar
>>Thyagarajan
>>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. September 2004 12:33
>>An: [email protected]
>>Betreff: Re: JCA 1.5 and ActivationSpec
>>
>>
>>Hi Stefan
>>
>> > Must all properties in bean ActivationSpec be type "java.lang.String"?
>>No. The ActivationSpec is a JavaBean, and so, it can take any type.
>>
>>Thanks for pointing this issue out in 8.0 UR1. An issue has been
>>raised and you could
>>track/vote for it at [1] [The URL might be valid only after a while].
>>
>>As of now the workaround is:
>>- Define activationspec properties as java.lang.String properties
>>and transform the
>>String to the appropriate data type within the ActivationSpec JavaBean
>>
>>Hope this helps.
>>Thanks
>>--Siva.
>>[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6171729
>>
>>Stefan Krieger wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>Must all properties in bean ActivationSpec be type "java.lang.String"?
>>>I found nothing about it in the spec but all their examples are
>>
>>using Strings only.
>>
>>>SunAS 8 SP1 throws exceptions if any other type (Boolean,
>>
>>Integer etc.) in the property setter is used.
>>
>>>Can somebody shed some light on this?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>==================================================================
>>=========
>>
>>>To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include
>>
>>in the body
>>
>>>of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST".  For general help,
>>
>>send email to
>>
>>>[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".
>>
>>==================================================================
>>=========
>>To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include
>>in the body
>>of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST".  For general help,
>>send email to
>>[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".
>>
>
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".