Re: JCA in a non-managed environment

--- David Jencks <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Whatever that piece of the spec is trying to
> communicate (perhaps
> rather unsucessfully), I'm sure it is not suggesting
> that a connector
> needs to include a jndi implementation nor a jca
> deployment mechanism,

At least to me it suggests that the deployment code
need be written and the jndi implementation present,
though I seem to recall that it states these issues
can be handled either by the RA developer or the
application developer so strictly speaking it's not
absolutely required to be included with the Connector.
 Not that I think that any of this is reasonable.  For
what it's worth I ended up writing my deployment code
against the rmiregistry and it was pretty quick and
simple and it's a pretty safe assumption that the
rmiregistry will be available in any java environment.
 I keep meaning to take a look at the 1.5
specification to see whether it reads the same with
respect to this issue.

-Jason



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".