ResourceAdapter and MCF instances
Jeff Crump <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:59:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.connector |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm porting my resource adapter to J2CA 1.5 and I'm wondering about the relationship between the ResourceAdapter class and its MCF instances. The EIS I'm connecting to has both "remote" (over the network) and "local" (inproc) connection types; my J2CA 1.0 implementation has an MCF implementation for each. The two implementations share a base class and a small set of properties. In 1.5, should I have two different ResourceAdapter classes, or would one suffice? What are the pros/cons of selecting one approach over the other? ----------------------- Jeff Crump Sonic Software Corporation Sr. Software Engineer, XIS [email protected] tel: +1 781 999 7030 http://www.sonicsoftware.com =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "signoff CONNECTOR-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".