Re: Need help about code mobility

Andrea Angeloni wrote:
> Hello, Gregg!
> You wrote to "Andrea Angeloni" <[email protected]> on Thu, 04 May 2006
> 08:40:26 -0500:
>
> GW> As Dan said, this code, has to executing within the confines of a
>
> Thanks for the example. It clarifies me further what I was suspecting.
>
> Before your and Dan's explanations I thought  RMI codebase property
> specification as a true classpath extension of an application. After Dan's

Do you think this mistaken understanding of RMI codebase is common?
Asked another way, do you think a lot of programmers view codebase like
this?

> answers, I've guessed something like your tip: I've already used dynamic
> classloading (URLClassloader) for downloading classes from a class
> repository in a general java developing field (where RMI is not present); I

Okay, so just an FYI:

I'd suggest you check out the JavaDoc for
net.jini.loader.pref.PreferredClassLoader which provides some additional
useful behaviours that URLClassLoader doesn't have.

> thought that in RMI this could be been unnecessary because of the presence
> of a default use of RMIClassLoader. Instead of RMIClassLoader, producers
> and
> consumers are resolved by default classloader. This is obvious (now).
>

Glad we got it sorted!

Best wishes,

Dan.

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVASPACES-USERS".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".

To view past JAVASPACES-USERS postings, please see:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/javaspaces-users.html