Re: Another question about codebases and jar versions
"Logan, Patrick" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.jini |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> No a new class loader will be created for that annotation, meaning > that classes defined in that new loader are not equal to those in > the class loader associated with the old URL. I hope this helps in > redefining your questions. Great. That was nagging me as I wrote it, but I thought, no, there were times when one would end up with the same class loader. > In general this is the behavior you want. Yes, that helps with the questions I had. As in several go away. > There is however a use case where this is nasty. Dagnabbit. > In this case I would want to be able to sent an old codebase > annotation to the client, which might result in them not getting the > bug-fix but if the bug is not hindering them at least it would help > them to continue. Is there a typical way to do this? Or is there a conventional way to get a client with old objects to fail and take some app-specific upgrade measures? Or? Thanks -Patrick -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Getting Started: http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started Community Web Site: http://jini.org jini-users Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html Unsubscribing: email "signoff JINI-USERS" to [email protected]