Re: Why is there no ServerMinPrincipalType constraint
Mark Brouwer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.jini |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gregg Wonderly wrote: > I'd tend to agree with Bob That alone is reason enough to disagree with you Gregg ;-) > Currently we don't have such complications, so I'm not seeing a need for > a type > of authentication, yet. If you are ready to greatly generalize the IL > mechanisms to carry arbitrary Principals instead of just the two currently, > explicitly recognized, then we might need to keep certain types from > flowing > under certain circumstances. I hope my response to Bob shows that even with the Kerberos and X.500 principals there can be justification for such a constraint, but I agree when more principals are supported the need for a wildcard constraint becomes more evident. -- Mark -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Getting Started: http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started Community Web Site: http://jini.org jini-users Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html Unsubscribing: email "signoff JINI-USERS" to [email protected]