Re: Jini vs/and OSGi

Dennis Reedy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sun.jini
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Adrian,

IMHO I see the two technologies as not opposed, but as working
together. OSGi as a micro-kernel architecture, Jini as technology
that makes Java services (components) accessible through the network.
OSGi does a really nice job at the JVM level (who knows whats going
to happen with JMS), Jini excels on the network (its primary domain).

Enabling Jini technology based services to be activated as OSG
bundles may be the combination going forward.

My very quick $0.02

Cheers

Dennis

On Mar 13, 2007, at 413PM, Adrian wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Would anyone care to comment on where they see things heading with the
> aforementioned specifications? There seems to be significant
> functional overlap
> in current implementations. My impression is that OSGi is gaining a
> lot of steam
> (mostly due to the huge success of the Eclipse project, I suppose)
> and will
> probably be evolving to offer more and more of what Jini does. While
> Jini/Javaspaces has also been in the news recently, OSGi seems to
> be leading in
> developer/tool maker mindshare and there is a lot of 'real' work
> done in terms
> of advancing the spec. This article, written at the end of 2005,
> http://www.osgi.org/blog/2005/11/why-did-we-let-jini-out-of-osgi-
> r4.html doesn't
> doesn't make it sound very promising for Jini (viewed through the
> subjective
> eyes of the OSGi Alliance at least). I'm curious why there was no
> one (I'm
> thinking GigaSpaces or Dan C., for example) to beat the drums for
> Jini to be at
> least kept in the "Recommended" section of the OSGi spec.
>
> Would it make sense to think of a JavaSpace as an OSGi service
> instead of a Jini
> one when and if OSGi evolves to provide service lookup across a
> grid? Are the
> security/classloader issues mentioned in the article areas that
> Jini will
> address in the near term?
>
> The following presentation talks about using OSGi and Jini
> together, so not
> everyone seems to agree on where the future is headed for both specs.
> http://www.jini.org/wiki/
> 10th_JCM_Sessions#Service_oriented_components_on_the_grid_using_OSGi_a
> nd_Jini
>
>
> Enquiring minds want to know.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Getting Started:     http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started
> Community Web Site:  http://jini.org
> jini-users Archive:  http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-
> users.html
> Unsubscribing:       email "signoff JINI-USERS"  to
> [email protected]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting Started:     http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started
Community Web Site:  http://jini.org
jini-users Archive:  http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html
Unsubscribing:       email "signoff JINI-USERS"  to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.