Re: JERI thread names

Mark Brouwer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sun.jini
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bob Scheifler wrote:
>> What kind of advantages are you thinking of with 1.5-and-later
>> ThreadPoolExecutor, or in other words do you believe the current
>> concurrency utilities in com.sun.jini.thread need replacement.
>
> I haven't really thought about it enough to know, but I think
> there's advantage in using standard facilities and removing code
> from River, even if no new functionality comes from it.

There is at least one facility in the current utilities that has no
equivalent and that is the runAfter facility. Also I at least have a lot
of code and investments on the current contracts provided by the
utilities as you might remember from discussions in the past.

So I'm very concerned with this.
--
Mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting Started:     http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started
Community Web Site:  http://jini.org
jini-users Archive:  http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html
Unsubscribing:       email "signoff JINI-USERS"  to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.