Re: JERI vs. JRMP performance penalties

Cornelius, Martin (DWBI) wrote:
> As MARK suggested in a previous post, i just took the time to experiment
> a little with the inbound and outbound rations used by JERI's
> multiplexing. Fortunately, they can be set via properties:
> 
> com.sun.jini.jeri.connection.mux.client.initialInboundRation
> com.sun.jini.jeri.connection.mux.server.initialInboundRation
> 
> However, increasing client.initialInboundRation ration had no dramatic
> effect to throughput with my littele example ( i tried 0x10000, 0x20000,
> 0x40000 and 0x100000 )
>  
> Increasing server.initialInboundRation to 0x10000 also had no effect.
> However, setting it 0x20000 has the effect that the first call from the
> client NEVER COMES BACK !

Hi Martin,

I don't know whether you are subscribed to the river commit mailing list
as Bob Scheifler just added this issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-281, also did he add
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-280 which indicates that
improvements can be found in another area as well. Today I did some
tests myself of which I wrote a posting to river-dev (on which I believe
you are subscribed).

As you can see you brought us some work ;-)
-- 
Mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting Started:     http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started
Community Web Site:  http://jini.org
jini-users Archive:  http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html
Unsubscribing:       email "signoff JINI-USERS"  to [email protected]