Re: Relieving some ClassLoader contention in PreferredClassProvider
Bob Scheifler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.jini |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> So up till now you showed me the java.net.URL implementation is very bad > at following the standards Whether it's spec or impl in this case is for someone else (not me) to claim, but yes, I thought that weakness of java.net.URL was understood. > the URLs that won't throw a > MalformedURLException can't be delivered over the Internet because the > number one server refuses so, my embedded JAR file server refuses so > too, but don't know about the one of the JTSK. The number one server for codebases is of course ClassServer ;-) and it will happily serve them up. > So I must conclude that up till now you haven't really proofed (for me) > there would be harm in the conversion I had in mind. At least the status quo is safely preserved. :) - Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Getting Started: http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started Community Web Site: http://jini.org jini-users Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html Unsubscribing: email "signoff JINI-USERS" to [email protected]