Re: Digital Signature for MIDlet?
Ward Willats <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.kvm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 07:54 AM 7/24/2007, foo shyn wrote: >Thanx for the link. The project would be running in Malaysia and the >targeted carriers would be the 3 main telcos in our country. >The application would connect through HTTP connection to back end >servers to perform transaction / data transfer, and we are thinking of >getting it done through HTTPS, which is why i'm looking at SSL. > >However, Motorola does not support digital signature for MIDlets? Motorola certainly does, and with the VeriSign Class 3 PCA too. Generally most recent phones (last couple of years) carry a full load of VeriSign root certificates. Some early Samsung and LG device do not, or if they do carry them, they may be only made available to the WAP browser and not the JVM. Some carriers (Vodafone) also remove all certs except their own on some devices. For example, I have seen Vodafdne Motorola devices with only the Vodafone cert. Even though I work for VeriSign (client development, not certs) I agree that it is best not to sign the midlet unless you really need access to some proprietary API. You'll have far fewer headaches. -- Ward =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "signoff KVM-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".