Re: Digital Signature for MIDlet?
Jliss-Viewsonics <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.kvm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I need to add a comment here about the single OEM approach. As far as I know only RIM enables the use of the same certificate across all of it's phones and makes signing an almost seamless part of development and deployment. I haven't seen Motorola doing this and I have been working with Moto phones for 8 years. If the OEM's wnat to control this why are they making it so frustrating to use for developers ? Jerome [email protected] tel.: 215-635-3980 fax.: 215-821-1029 > -----Original Message----- > From: A mailing list for KVM discussion > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Digital Signature for MIDlet? > > > Shawn, > > As I mentioned in my previous post Sun realizes that not all is well when it comes to certificates. Should we have > addressed that earlier? Probaby. But I don't quite agree with the picture you're painting: > > - A single-OEM or single-carrier approach as with RIM is by definition a *much* easier problem to solve. And as you > mention even RIM has trouble getting the operators in line. One of Java ME's main benefits is wide platform support and > given the vastly different business models and agendas of the various players such as OEMs and carriers difficulties are > not unexpected. > > - Java ME is growing by leaps and bounds (1.8 billion devices and counting) and there are many developers and carriers > making good money in Java ME. That's not to say life is always easy but 'getting sized for a coffin' it's not. > > - Supporting web-based mobile access is a natural extension of existing web sites and has its pros and cons. This is > mostly orthogonal to Java ME. > > - Motorola has its own share of problems and inconsistencies in execution. I don't see that as a vote on Java ME. > > - Microsoft never liked Java much so it is not sursprising that Windows Mobile doesn't come with Java ME pre-installed. > However, many people are running Java ME apps on Windows Mobile by installing a Java ME stack. > > To add some information on Java Verified: Orange, Motorola, Nokia, Vodafone, Sony Ericsson, and Sun are all working to > making Java Verified better. And that's why I am working with the developer community to provide feedback to Java Verified. > > Cheers, > > -- Terrence > [Message sent by forum member 'terrencebarr' (terrencebarr)] > > http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=228537 > > =========================================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body > of the message "signoff KVM-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [email protected] and include in the body of the message "help". > =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "signoff KVM-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".