[OFF-TOPIC?] - SOAP Fault should be defined? Where?
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:57:55 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.sun.xml.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Portugal Telecom Inova????o, S.A. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greetings, I'm working with SOAP, and till now I already defined a schema that should be applied (verified) in all the SOAP content (body) of my SOAP messages. Now, since I'm not experienced with SOAP architecture, I intend to clarify a doubt here if possible. - When, for any reason, I must throw a SOAP fault I must define the faultcode (processing code), faultstring (human readable), faultactor (URI of who caused) and a detail part (could be the request soap message's body content - if not understood, or a custom (optional) content if needed). My question is, where these definitions should be specified? Should my original schema be aware of this possible errors? Is there any specific schema for this issue? Is the SOAP schema aware of this? It makes sense that exist any schema for this issue? The (fault) actor is abstract here or must be also defined (validated) here? thanks, Pedro Salazar. -- <id name="pedro salazar"> <email>[email protected]</email> <pgp-key-id>0E129E31D803BC61</pgp-key-id> </id>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 155 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQA+cPDTDhKeMdgDvGERAlELAJ9d/nFOYHHnSf7OeotmDGLtADN23ACbBLHD L4UuwJJD0kFT3OO7FqOlIZo= =3DRX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----