Re: Getting back into it

I really recommend Mavenizing to this effect.  I bet dion would help 
with that..  (http://jakarta.apache.org/maven)

Alternatively (and this is what POI does) if maven doesn't do what you 
need Centipede (http://krysalis.org/centipede) and Forrest 
(http://xml.apache.org/forrest) might help.

However it really depends on whether Maven works under gump...

Gump should be one of our top priorities (jakarta.apache.org/gump) 
because it could do the builds and site publish for us...

-Andy

Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> Part of what you discuss may involve having multiple Tapestry modules.  
> Not good or bad, just a statement.
>  
> Yes, and we may need to reorganize things further to reflect the 
> standard Apache project layout ... if we want to get the synnergy thing 
> going, we want to make Tapestry "friendly" to other Apache developers.
>  
> Renaming packages looks like a big delete-and-add to CVS, so that's a 
> good time to also reorganize directory structure.  We should brainstorm 
> what that structure should look like.
> 
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Geoff Longman <mailto:glongman-JVFTG6EM2JjNybAxKxMg8VaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
>     *To:* Tapestry Contrib <mailto:tapestry-contrib-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
>     *Cc:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:34 AM
>     *Subject:* [Tapestry-contrib] Getting back into it
> 
>     Whoo-ee, I have to say that this past holiday season was the worst
>     on record for me.
>     Just before Christmas good friends of ours had a terrible accident
>     and their little girl was quite badly burned.
>     It'll be a tough road ahead for their family but everything is
>     relatively ok now.
>      
>     Also, I had a bit of a health scare myself last week and on top of
>     all that we have a baby due imminently.
>     Note: having a baby ids a good thing, it just added to the overall
>     stress this holiday season!
>      
>     So, forgive if I've been quite the last while. I'm easing back into
>     the 'normal' things now...
>      
>     Glad to see that the Apache thing is rolling along. Kudos to Andy et al!
>      
>     Looking for something to do Tapestry-wise and I was wondering if
>     anybody had any thoughts on
>     the structure for the code base in CVS.
>      
>     Currently, everything is located under the top-level Tapestry
>     folder. That incl the framework, vlib, clover, contrib, workbench,
>     and the
>     mock opera :-) that Howard has built for testing.
>      
>     Would it make sense, after the move, the package rename, the Gump
>     build (don't really understand that) was done
>     if we examined the structure and split some of it out to the top level?
>      
>     The current advantage is that one can check out 'Tapestry' and get
>     everything at once. One disadvantage is that to examine, for
>     example, the vlib using Spindle is quite difficult.
>      
>     As I said, I realize there's still a lot of work to do before making
>     these kind of changes. But I'm willing to play around with this.
>      
>     Geoff
>      
>     Geoffrey Longman
>     Intelligent Works Inc.
>      
>      
> 





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com