Re: Getting back into it
"Malcolm Edgar" <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:50:47 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.tapestry.contrib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Big +1 on the Marvenizing Tapestry. >From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[email protected]> >To: "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[email protected]>, >tapestry-contrib-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org >Subject: Re: [Tapestry-contrib] Getting back into it >Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:07:03 -0500 > >I really recommend Mavenizing to this effect. I bet dion would help with >that.. (http://jakarta.apache.org/maven) > >Alternatively (and this is what POI does) if maven doesn't do what you need >Centipede (http://krysalis.org/centipede) and Forrest >(http://xml.apache.org/forrest) might help. > >However it really depends on whether Maven works under gump... > >Gump should be one of our top priorities (jakarta.apache.org/gump) because >it could do the builds and site publish for us... > >-Andy > >Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: >>Part of what you discuss may involve having multiple Tapestry modules. >>Not good or bad, just a statement. >> Yes, and we may need to reorganize things further to reflect the >>standard Apache project layout ... if we want to get the synnergy thing >>going, we want to make Tapestry "friendly" to other Apache developers. >> Renaming packages looks like a big delete-and-add to CVS, so that's a >>good time to also reorganize directory structure. We should brainstorm >>what that structure should look like. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Geoff Longman <mailto:glongman-JVFTG6EM2JjNybAxKxMg8VaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> >> *To:* Tapestry Contrib >><mailto:tapestry-contrib-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> >> *Cc:* [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:34 AM >> *Subject:* [Tapestry-contrib] Getting back into it >> >> Whoo-ee, I have to say that this past holiday season was the worst >> on record for me. >> Just before Christmas good friends of ours had a terrible accident >> and their little girl was quite badly burned. >> It'll be a tough road ahead for their family but everything is >> relatively ok now. >> Also, I had a bit of a health scare myself last week and on top >>of >> all that we have a baby due imminently. >> Note: having a baby ids a good thing, it just added to the overall >> stress this holiday season! >> So, forgive if I've been quite the last while. I'm easing back >>into >> the 'normal' things now... >> Glad to see that the Apache thing is rolling along. Kudos to >>Andy et al! >> Looking for something to do Tapestry-wise and I was wondering if >> anybody had any thoughts on >> the structure for the code base in CVS. >> Currently, everything is located under the top-level Tapestry >> folder. That incl the framework, vlib, clover, contrib, workbench, >> and the >> mock opera :-) that Howard has built for testing. >> Would it make sense, after the move, the package rename, the >>Gump >> build (don't really understand that) was done >> if we examined the structure and split some of it out to the top >>level? >> The current advantage is that one can check out 'Tapestry' and >>get >> everything at once. One disadvantage is that to examine, for >> example, the vlib using Spindle is quite difficult. >> As I said, I realize there's still a lot of work to do before >>making >> these kind of changes. But I'm willing to play around with this. >> Geoff >> Geoffrey Longman >> Intelligent Works Inc. >> >> > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com >_______________________________________________ >Tapestry-contrib mailing list >Tapestry-contrib-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-contrib _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com