Re: Fwd: Re: [Tapestry-developer] Tapestry and RSS
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:34:24 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.tapestry.contrib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
While I don't think my opinion should count for much on this. I am in the URL control crowd. Take a look at what Cocoon does with its sitemap (xml.apache.org/cocoon). URLs are pretty important in some companies and Can be a powerful tool for usability. -Andy [email protected] wrote: >i'm reposting this, as it never made it to the list :) > > >On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:46:12 -0500, [email protected] said: > > >>hi, >> >>i don't know if i count as a "user" but i do like short urls, that tell >>about the structure of a site's information. i like it when i can easily >>navigate around if i get a 404 (ok, linkrot is bad too, but it's a fact >>of life). or jump straight to something i know is there, but have not >>bookmarked it (eg. i can jump to the javadoc of java.lang.String without >>having it bookmarked, or even bringing up the page)... >> >>as a site-builder, i like nice urls that i can send out in an email >>without it breaking (less than 80 chars) on certain mail readers... or >>print on a piece of paper and a user can type it in... simple urls make >>log analysis easier too. >> >>call me weird, but other's share my opinion - here's a couple of links >>google gave me for "url usability": >> >>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html >>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/us-cranky8.html?dwzone=web >>http://www.bohmann.dk/articles/making_urls_predictable.html >> >>i think ugly urls are against the spirit of the original concept - use >>them if you have no other option... >>http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html >> >>or take your mailing address for example - yeah, it could be >>?1235&1234@fooboo-123@arlington@MA@USA@ but "1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA >>98052, USA" still looks better to me :) >> >> viktor >> >> >>On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:07:59 +0000, [email protected] said: >> >> >>>I double-dog dare you to find me a user (I mean an end user, not a client >>>who >>>think s/he knows "what user's want") ... find me a user that actually >>>cares >>>about the URLs. >>> >>>They might care if they can't bookmark a URL and come back later. They >>>might >>>care if the URL is broken. But I double-dog dare you to find me a user >>>that >>>cares about the difference between "/products/food/fruit/apple" and >>>"/app? >>>service=catalog&sp=food&sp=fruit&sp=apple". We're not >>>talking >>>telegrams here; nobody's paying by the letter (well, maybe on WAP). >>> >>>The only difference is that users of the Tapestry app will be less >>>inclined to >>>second guess the URL construction by manually hacking the URL, and >>>therefore >>>less likely to be frustrated when it doesn't work. >>> >>>Also, the fact that users are trying to second guess and circumvent your >>>application means that your app has a usuability problem ... and it isn't >>>the >>>format of your URLs. >>> >>>You Are Not Your Users. >>> >>> >>-- >> >> [email protected] >> >>-- >>http://fastmail.fm - The professional email service >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now! Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap, MP3 Players, XBox Games, Flying Saucers, WebCams, Smart Putty. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/