Re: Re: Tapestry?

I've subscribed to the incubator list.  I was just going to ask you about
progress.

My concern is CVS.

Do we start clean, or do we transfer our CVS repository from SourceForge to
Jakarta?

SourceForge prepares a nightly .tar of the repository.

Currently, we are progressing on three fronts.  The CVS HEAD branch has 2.3,
which really should shift over to a beta release soon.

I've got a huge number of changes in the hship-2-3 branch, and Mind Bridge
has his set of changes in his branch.  There have been commits to the HEAD
since I made my branch; it won't be difficult to synchronize my changes back
into the SF CVS repository, but if we shift repositories it'll be a
nightmare.

Ideally, we would freeze development on Tapestry long enough to get a clean
repository download from SF, then install it on Jakarta and maintain history
and integrity.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; "Tapestry Contrib"
<tapestry-contrib-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: [Tapestry-contrib] Re: Tapestry?


> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >
> >> Status?
> >
> >
> > in part, waiting for me to commit my edits to the web site.
> > also waiting for (but not blocking on) sam ruby's response
> > from jakarta.
> >
> > let's see.  howard, are you here?  probably the first things
> > to do would be mailing lists and a cvs module into which
> > the code can be transferred.  anyone think of an earlier
> > step than that?
>
> It would be preferrable if the Tapestry committers subscribed to this
> list at this time. (general-subscribe-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org)
>
> Those things are listed in the proposal.
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TapestryProposal).
> "
>
> [3] identify the Jakarta resources to be created
>
> [3.1] mailing lists(s)
>
> tapestry-user tapestry-dev tapestry-cvs
>
> [3.2] CVS repositories
>
> jakarta-tapestry
>
> [3.3] Bugzilla
>
> framework - tapestry components - web site, contrib library,
> documentation, examples
>
> [3.4] Wiki
>
> "
>
> It might be good if there was a public incubator module that I and later
> the Tapestry Committers could check such things into (as the proposal is
> IMHO in a post-wiki stage).
>
> Do you feel moving the mailing lists is in the best interests of the
> Tapestry community and the
> community proper?  Or should that perhaps wait until a presupposed move
> to Jakarta.
>
> Possible Disadvantages (assuming migration to jakarta):
> requiring people to unsubscribe (or not) from sourceforge mail lists,
> subscribe to apache-incubator mail lists,  then subscribe to the jakarta
> ones later is kinda rough.
>
> The website also has some of the same issues (and add google to that,
> broken links for anyone referring to Tapestry and sourceforge doesn't
> like to delete things)...
> Though we could possibly handle that through configuration (I think)
> later on by autoredirecting from incubator.apache.org/tapestry/*
> jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/* via httpd config.
>
> The CVS module does not have the same issue (there is only one
repository).
>
> What are your thoughts on these matters?
>
> thanks,
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Tapestry-contrib mailing list
> Tapestry-contrib-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-contrib
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf