Re: Stale session

one more word, just for completeness: everything is described in all 
required detail in the docs. Thats a big plus for tapestry/Howard.

Dave Roberts wrote:
> Dirk, thanks! This finally helped. I had been trying to set the stateful 
> parameter, but I finally figured out I was using a static-binding rather 
> than a dynamic binding. I figured since "false" was a constant, I should 
> use a static binding in that case, but I guess not. The posting you 
> directed me to caused me to look at the direct XML that Spindle produces 
> and I noticed the difference. As soon as I set things correctly, things 
> worked fine. Doh!
>  
> So this then raises another question: What are the differences between 
> all the various binding types that Tapestry/Spindle supports? Should I 
> just be using dynamic bindings everywhere? I think I got throw off by 
> Spindle's choices and my equating constants to "static." Had I been 
> editing the XML directly, I probably would have just used "binding" and 
> it would have worked fine. Spindle presented me with a bunch of choices 
> and so I picked the one that seemed the most obvious. Should I just be 
> using dynamic bindings every time? If not, why, when, and where would I 
> use the other types? Previously, I had thought that "dynamic" was just 
> used for OGNL expressions accessing beans. Should it be used for 
> anything Java-like (I mean, OGNL != Java, so I didn't expect that 
> "false" would be valid syntax for that).
>  
> In any case, I read on the Wiki that somebody is rewriting the tutorial. 
> Some treatment of this issue would probably make sense, particularly for 
> people using Spindle rather than editing the XML raw. (BTW, this is not 
> a slam on Spindle; it's a fine tool that really helps out.)
>  
> -- Dave
> 
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Dirk Olmes <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *To:* Dave Roberts <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Cc:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Sent:* Saturday, December 14, 2002 6:45 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: [Tapestry-developer] Stale session
> 
>         I'm using Tapestry 2.2 with Eclipse, Spindle 1.1.3, the Jetty
>         version packaged with Tapestry 2.2. I have written a quick
>         little Main class that sets up Jetty and gets things going. I
>         have Tapestry working enough to create a few pages, use
>         PageLinks, a Form, etc. It's just DirectLink that I have
>         problems with right now.
>          
>         Can somebody explain how, exactly, Tapestry as a framework
>         decides the session is stale? I even looked at the source in the
>         DirectService class and didn't see anything there that looked
>         like it even checked or threw an exception related to a stale
>         session.
> 
> 
>     Hmm, did you try to make the link not stateful? See
>     http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=2214563
> 
>     HTH,
> 
>     -dirk
> 





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/