RE: component definitions
Christian Sell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.tapestry.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
mb, in continuation of the previous mail: Of yourse "new component" is more "powerful", because you can override everything that makes up a component, whereas reused configurations can only override parameters. But I would still question your arithmetics: >New Component (Tapestry 2.4): >----------------------------- >1 x defining a new component > 5 lines + 'component configuration', 1 line template, 1 line alias > >N x using the new component > 1 line in template Does this assume that the component can be referenced in the template via something like <span jwcid="/path/path/component"? If so, where would the configuration appear? Would it not have to be repeated in every page/component making use of the new component? Christian -- [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating? Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/