Re: Apache Tapestry for Java 11

Paul Stanton <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:55:09 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.tapestry.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"We can push a new 5.5 beta for early testers."

^-- is this available? if not, any eta?

On 11/09/2019 4:43 am, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:31 AM Chris Poulsen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I did roll an "internal" 5.5-beta version based on the code from 12th July
>> as there are some fixes in HEAD that are not in the beta-2 and that bastard
>> build is what we currently are using without problems.
>>
> We can push a new 5.5 beta for early testers.
>
>
>> If 5.5 isn't 100% ready for release yet, it seems to be really close and it
>> would be good to get it finalized IMO.
>>
> Yes, we're close. I'd just want to finish the support for running without
> Bootstrap (or with Bootstrap 4) before releasing 5.5. I don't see any other
> blockers or nice-to-haves. Other people may have their own, of course. :)
>
> And yes, 5.5 supports Java 11 bytecode, and that's exactly the issue that
> most probably took the team the longer to develop.
>
>
>> --
>> Chris
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:11 PM Charles Roth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good to me.  We'd be very happy to test a 5.5-beta. (Large
>>> application that has about 1M LOC, including unit-tests, TML, etc.)
>>>
>>> On 9/9/2019 3:08 PM, Dmitry Gusev wrote:
>>>> Hi Charles,
>>>>
>>>> Current state of the master branch should run just fine on Java 11;
>>> there's
>>>> no release you can download though.
>>>>
>>>> We should probably start a vote on another Tapestry 5.5-beta soon to
>>>> release current state of the master branch,
>>>> and maybe make a first 5.5.0 release right after we get some feedback
>>> from
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:54 PM Charles Roth <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Is there any new(ish) word on Tapestry 5.5 or any other release that
>>>>> will run under Java 9, 10, and maybe 11?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/8/2018 12:54 PM, Bob Harner wrote:
>>>>>> Yes. The unreleased 5.5 version passses all tests with the Java 9+
>>>>>> compatible version of ASM (which was the obstacle for running
>> Tapestry
>>>>> 5.4
>>>>>> under Java 9+) and should be usable for Java 9 and 10 now (once
>>>>> released),
>>>>>> although it hasn't been tested enough by others. I haven't checked it
>>>>> with
>>>>>> Java 11 yet. The Tapestry nightly snapshot process is broken
>> currently,
>>>>> and
>>>>>> that's the principal obstacle to the 5.5 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/TAP5-2588
>>>>>> My weekends have been occupied by other projects the last few weeks
>>> but I
>>>>>> hope to get back on it next weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 9:49 AM gard sæbø <[email protected]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are upgrading all our Java applications, which currently runs on
>>> Java
>>>>>>> 8, to Java 11.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our web applications use Apache Tapestry as the frontend framework,
>>> but
>>>>> it
>>>>>>> seems a bit quite on the Tapestry commit log in comparison with
>> other
>>>>>>> frontend frameworks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will there be any upgrade which will support Java 11 and future Java
>>>>>>> versions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Gard Sæbø
>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]