Re: comparison of open source jvm

"Michael Franz" <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:19:44 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.vm.kaffe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dalibor Topic <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rohit wrote:
> > I know i must be missing few important things to consider for this
> > comparison. Also many of you must have already analyzed these
> > implementation and compared them. So whatever information you can
> > provide wrt to this would be highly appreciated.
>
> I'd consider most of the GNU Classpath based implementations (Kaffe,
> JamVM, Cacao) to be exchangeable at the feature level, as they all use
> the same class library underneath.
>
> They differ in terms of size, VM internals, and performance, but they
> should be readily available for whatever arm-linux platform you are
> building for (or easy enough to cross-compile), ao that  you can make
> your testing specific to your application and your environment, rather
> than having to make decisions based on generic comparisons.
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>
Going over some old emails ... is SableVM still viable?  I believe it also
uses GNU classpath.

Michael

_______________________________________________
kaffe mailing list
[email protected]
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe