Re: Artistic license request
Adam Heath <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:12:51 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.vm.kaffe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Reini Urban wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to convert JVM classfiles to run under parrot. > I do not try interpret or jit the bytecode, I just read the classfiles, > convert it offline to our internal representation and compile this then > to our optimized bytecode/jit/executable which is register based. > So I don't need to verify and interpret the class files, just read it. > > A colleague already did that for .NET, so JVM is no big deal. > > The problem I have is that I'd like to use some parts of your > sourcecode, just the classreader and some headers with the basic > structs, and I want to ask if it's possible to release that under the > Artistic license 2.0 for this project. > Otherwise I would have to rewrite it from scratch, because parrot does > not accept the GPL or LGPL alone. > > No big deal, writing the op specs into our format from the vmspec is > most of the work, but it would help a bit. Pasting the structs from the > vmspec html or pdf is too stupid, and there's a tiny bit of logic also > involved. Why not use org.objectweb.asm?