Re: Contributing The SableVM Virtual Machine To The Harmony Project

On Tue, March 21, 2006 11:24 am, Etienne Gagnon wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>
> I forgot to say:  I have no problem with keeping the SpMT stuff in your
> Sandbox under the LGPL.

I should probably clarify my intentions.  I am planning to make a
language-independent (i.e. not just Java) library for speculation that ca=
n
support more than one client VM.  I think LGPL is the right license for
it, since it will be moving away from the SableVM project completely and =
I
see no compelling reason to change it.

The client code that is necessary to have in SableVM, eventually I would
like to migrate to the trunk, and so in the future changing the license
should not be much of a problem.  However, at the moment, the stuff in my
sandbox is all mixed up, and I need to modularize things a bit more.

> Yet, I am asking other developers to extend the relicensing permissions
> to their sandbox, as much of the interesting SableVM code is still sitt=
ing
> in sandboxes, such as loading constraints, remote debugging, etc.

Yes, I think my situation is quite different --- it was heavily
research-oriented and didn't have much to do with making the trunk of
SableVM better.

Cheers,
Chris

> Etienne
>
>
> Chris Pickett wrote:
>
>> I won't give any permission to the stuff in my sandbox, not yet.  In
>> the future that might change.
>
> --
> Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.            http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
> SableVM:                                       http://www.sablevm.org/
> SableCC:                                       http://www.sablecc.org/
> _______________________________________________
> SableVM-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://sablevm.org/lists/control/listinfo/sablevm-devel
>
>