Re: Implementing Harmony's VM Interface

Hi Etienne,

>I think that SableVM could gain much in stability by dropping the
>ill-defined Classpath interface, and by implementing Harmony's VMI.  As
>a result, SableVM would strictly depend on Harmony's Kernel classes.
>  
>
If you have some spare time, could you drop a few lines about
differences between Classpath and VMI interfaces? By the number of JVMs
that use Classpath I expected it to have a better designed and define
interface to JVM implementations.


[]s, Fernando Lozano