Re: Implementing Harmony's VM Interface
Etienne Gagnon <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:54:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.vm.sablevm.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0677998141== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig52941032AA654B73F185C798" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig52941032AA654B73F185C798 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > 1- I need to express why I prefer one to the other; it's not relevant. I meant: "I don't need..." Etienne -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ --------------enig52941032AA654B73F185C798 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEJYPWjyrJi4rH84gRApRKAJkBtDfIHyCQQzJJcCaqEPYWgrQv4wCfaJMl NfkcUWS+zI9dXwry3VU/iPg= =jlGw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig52941032AA654B73F185C798-- --===============0677998141== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ SableVM-devel mailing list [email protected] http://sablevm.org/lists/control/listinfo/sablevm-devel --===============0677998141==--