Re: Performance of WM

Hi Dominik,

I use now a lot of php and other rendering technologies.

I can tell you this: WM is relatively speaking fast. In fact, there is a 
benchmark I run on every build and I remain amazed at how fast it parses 
and renders and evaluates expressions.

Also, there is another factor. The tight integration with the Java 
language means you will be working with Java not some other language. If 
you want to go with Java, then WM is a great scripting companion. Of 
course, I am prejudiced but the claim is still true :).

Lane

Dominik wrote:

>Hy,
>i searched the wiki but didn't find any information about the performance of
>webmacro. How is it compared to a plain-output (via println()) servlet? And,
>perhaps somebody knows, how is it compared to a php script with a
>template-engine like smarty or other.
>
>Thanks
>TO
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
>speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Webmacro-user mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webmacro-user
>
>  
>

-- 
Lane Sharman
Providing Private and SPAM-Free Email
http://www.opendoors.com
858-755-2868



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click