Re: [werkflow-user] BPEL support

Hi Mark,

On 25 Feb 2004, at 09:05, Mark H. Wilkinson wrote:
> One way of looking at it is that IBM's product is using JMS messages to
> hold process case state, while werkflow is more likely to use a generic
> relational database.

Interestingly IBM's product doesn't work quite like this. It /does/ use 
a database to persist 'case' (they call them process instance) state. 
JMS only gets involved for the 'control' links, i.e. scheduling what to 
run next (or in parallel). As I say, more on this later when I get time 
to finish my other e-mail ;)

Paul
-- 
Paul Russell
[email protected]