Re: static and declare before use

That sounds good to me.

  - a

"Brian Alliet" <[email protected]> writes:
> Charles Goodwin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:59, Adam Megacz wrote:
> >> I see your point.  I think 'this' would be a bad idea since that word
> >> has a special meaning in ECMAScript.  Do you have another suggestion?
> >
> > Hmm I would say 'static.varname' but then it gives the static keyword
> > two separate meanings.
> 
> Not really. How about we just create a JS object for each template and stick
> it in the static script's scope as "static" and in <ui:box> scope as
> "static". In each case static point to the same object so it has the same
> meaning in both cases cases.
> 
> -Brian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/core
> 

-- 
"It's lucky," he added, after a pause, "that there are such a lot of
islands in the world.  I almost envy you, Mr. Watson."

                                                   -- Mustapha Mond