Re: fill and strings

On Mar 5, 2004, at 7:55 PM, Charles Goodwin wrote:

> Do you think that, for fill (and whatever properties take resources
> although I can't think of any at the moment) should accept
> ".foo.bar.baz.quuz" as a string and do the automatic breakdown of it?

No. I know it looks easier but it creates ambiguity. What if template A 
and template B are in two different resource roots and A somehow passes 
a string to B (maybe though a trap). Whose resource root applies?

The new way of doing resources really shouldn't be any harder to work 
with. It is just different. As always, feel free to post any questions 
you have to the list (no matter how stupid they may seem :) )

-Brian