Re: heinous breakage fixed

Charles Goodwin wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 10:43, Adam Megacz wrote:
>  
>
>>okay, I believe the heinous breakage from my last patch is now fixed.
>>    
>>
>
>Which one? ;)
>
>Have you checked out the 471 patch problems?  Or is this a fix for both
>the 471 and 495/499 patch breakage?
>  
>
No, this left the 471 fix in. Although the rendering problems appear 
less than what I recall when 471 originally was checked in, there are 
still substantial layout problems visible. The most obvious is the tabs 
(mostly, the first tab) in the sampler.

Adam, would I be able to convince you not to conflate multiple unrelated 
patches into a single commit? It would help the rest of us track down 
problems. The folling patch: "fixed heinous breakage, added backtrace 
support" is one example in your history of doing this. Darcs makes it 
*really* easy to only add certain patches when doing a record.

And, btw...I don't see any backtraces when encountering JSExn's. Could 
you provice a little bit of info behind the "added backtrace support" 
part of that patch?

-Tupshin