Re: freetype question
Brian Alliet <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:01:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 11, 2004, at 9:41 AM, David Crawshaw wrote: > Doesn't matter, the binary can't be GPLed. If it were, the license > would conflict with what we are licensed[*] to do. I wonder is using NestedVM to run Freetype is considered "linking" with it? You could make a good argument either way. Maybe we could release freetype.mips under a different license? -Brian