Re: ChildChange vs ChildAdded, ChildRemoved
Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:30:06 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.core |
|---|---|
| Organization | XWT Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 23:59 -0700, Adam Megacz wrote: > David Crawshaw <[email protected]> writes: > > No good. ChildAdded/Removed is useful because it gives a reference to > > the new/old child. > > Ack, good point. Good point as in: "I agree let's stick with ChildAdded/ChildRemoved" or "I want to go with ChildChange" or "I'm thinking" or "I'll just go with trapping numchildren anyway" ? (The last time you made such a comment was about PosChange which you proceeded to go through with dropping anyway, without explanation.) -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Online @ www.charlietech.com