Re: why my responses are so brief

On 19/04/2004, at 5:00 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
> Seriously, either I can spend N hours typing out an explanation, or
> you can spend roughly N*2 hours reading the source code.  Right now --
> and I don't mean to be arrogant -- I can accomplish more than twice as
> much work on Ibex per hour as you can.

And what happens when this code we're trying to understand has a bug in 
it?

Or are we meant to wait for you to find the bug and fix it?

After all, we can't find the bug, as to us the source is the definitive 
word on how it should work.

So you don't want us logging bugs, right?

What you're saying doesn't make any sense, because you've skewed the 
concept of value. Yes, we get the maximum number of programming hours 
if you don't talk to us, but the time spent it worthless because it 
doesn't produce anything.

To date, everything we've all done is worthless, because not a soul in 
the world can actually use it.

Please see my next message.

-- d