Re: PATCH: Bug 186
David Crawshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > I fully understand the use of cvs.xwt.org for everything once a widget > set is > completed -- you do not want to introduce bugs into a working system > -- but > during fast development it's going to be a pain. There would be no confirmation needed on the revamp branch. It would be open to all of us to go for it, just like the current cvs. I think I can get all the changes in the current widget audit into a new model (which as Charlie mentioned, it not really that different) in one day. My hope is the model is so similar, that it will introduce almost no bugs, and you guys can keep working the way you have been. If I can do it in one day, are you up for it? d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev