Re: passing an unknown # of arguments to a function?

Correct; arguments isn't an array, though it acts like one.

  - a

Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> writes:
> Did you try accessing arguments[0], arguments[1], etc...
> 
> It may not work like an array.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 31 March 2003 16:31
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [xwt-dev] passing an unknown # of arguments to a function?
> 
> 
> I thought I could get away with using the arguments array, but apparently
> not.  
> :-(
> 
> func1 = function() { xwt.recursivePrintObject(arguments); func2(arguments);
> }
> func2 = function() { xwt.recursivePrintObject(arguments); }
> 
> I call func1 as func1("abc", 1234, "1234");
> 
> On the output, all I see is
> 
> mytemplate: <object>
> mytemplate: <object>
> 
> I tried declaring them as function(arguments) but got the same type of
> output.  
> If I put a println to see the arguments.length, that is correct (3) in 
> func1() but wrong (1) in func2.
> 
> Is this possible?  How?
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev
> 

-- 

_______________________________________________
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev