Re: btw
Adam Megacz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | XWT |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Emiliano Heyns <[email protected]> writes: > Object ret = new XMLRPC("http://xmlrpc.xwt.org/RPC2/", > "dns.resolve").call(new Object[] { host }); > (rightfully) complains it cannot connect. Which is bad news for people > behind a proxy, We have to do this for security reasons. Please see the reference. > What about my earlier question? If we implicitly 'trust' the > connection to the server the xwar was loaded from, things like this > would still work even if the RPC server was offline. Still vulnerable; see www.xwt.org/sop.txt in the section on "quick swap dns". I'm in contact with Macromedia. I don't believe that Flash implements this security measure. If that is the case, and if Macromedia is comfortable with it, I will remove this check and simply claim "you're already vulnerable because your browser comes with flash preinstalled, so xwt isn't making things any worse". - a _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev